Who can apply
Projects using AI/ML/GenAI as a material part of the solution. “Use of AI” alone is insufficient; the submission must demonstrate value, adoption and responsible governance.
PMI membership and certification are generally optional. Work must be authorised for submission and capable of evidencing outcomes. General and category-specific eligibility both apply.
Evidence to prepare
Problem statement; why AI was appropriate; architecture/solution overview at a non-proprietary level; before/after metrics; adoption; human oversight; data/privacy/security controls; model governance; benefits.
Link each claim to a labelled exhibit, baseline and measurable result. Redact confidential and unnecessary personal data. The evidence pack is limited to 10 pages or equivalent.
Presentation template for this award
Use the Technology, AI & Transformation template. It contains 15 editable slides with prompts suited to this award family, an outcomes table, evidence references and declarations.
The presentation supports the written nomination and evidence package. Follow the category requirements and any finalist invitation for the required format and timing.
How this award is evaluated
Scroll the table horizontally to see additional columns, if needed.
| Criterion | Weight | What the jury looks for |
|---|---|---|
| Measurable value | 25% | Business, customer, operational or social value with before/after evidence. |
| Innovation & originality | 20% | Novel or distinctive use of AI appropriate to the problem. |
| Responsible AI, security & governance | 20% | Privacy, fairness, transparency, security, model risk and human oversight. |
| Adoption & change management | 15% | User adoption, workflow integration and organisational change. |
| Performance improvement | 10% | Quality, speed, productivity, accuracy or other measurable improvement. |
| Scalability & sustainability | 10% | Ability to sustain, govern and scale the solution. |
Each criterion uses a 1–5 evidence scale. Recommended weighted score = Σ(weight × score ÷ 5). A 70/100 quality threshold informs jury judgement, with the option to confer no award.
How to apply
- Check eligibility and select this category. For a project, confirm that it is not entered in another competitive project or domain category.
- Prepare the common nomination and the category evidence listed above. Download a draft and attach the final, authorised package to an email when nominations open.
- The Secretariat acknowledges receipt, assigns an application ID and checks completeness, eligibility and classification.
- Three independent reviewers assess the evidence under the proposed 2027 review standard. The category jury moderates scores and identifies up to three finalists.
- Only shortlisted entrants receive fee or waiver instructions and an invitation to submit their final dossier and present.
- Attend the scheduled jury session. Format proposed for this category: 15-minute presentation and 15-minute Q&A.
- Verification, procedural review and ratification precede the 30 January 2027 announcement.
Post-shortlisting fee
Any payment applies to the further assessment process and does not guarantee a finalist award or winning outcome. Conference registration, travel and accommodation are separate.
View every category and the fee policyCategory guidance
Finalists should expect specific jury questions on responsible AI, data provenance, security, bias/fairness, human accountability and claimed productivity/quality gains.
Grand Project pathway
The winner of this category is eligible for automatic consideration for Grand Project of the Year, using the existing submission and no additional application fee.
Read about the Grand Project honourBefore applying, check the final nomination window, geographic eligibility and fee or waiver terms. Category scoring criteria and weightings will be frozen before nominations open.