Skip to page
Explore the hub

Individual Professional Excellence

Programme in preparation

Distinguished Contribution to the Project Management Profession

Recognises sustained, high-impact contribution to the advancement of project management over a significant period.

Who can apply

Normally conferred by the Grand Jury based on confidential nominations invited from senior professionals, past leaders or the Awards Council. Self-nomination is not recommended. There need not be a recipient every year.

PMI membership and certification are generally optional. Work must be authorised for submission and capable of evidencing outcomes. General and category-specific eligibility both apply.

Geographic scope to be confirmed: An India connection is recommended. Final geographic eligibility will be published before nominations open.

Evidence to prepare

Career record; sustained impact; contribution to institutions/standards/education/research/practice; mentoring legacy; independent references; ethics record.

Link each claim to a labelled exhibit, baseline and measurable result. Redact confidential and unnecessary personal data. The evidence pack is limited to 10 pages or equivalent.

Invited nomination presentation

This honour follows a confidential, invited nomination route. Use the individual template only when invited or when the Secretariat requests supporting material.

PPTX · 15 slides · 218 KB

The presentation supports the written nomination and evidence package. Follow the category requirements and any finalist invitation for the required format and timing.

How this award is evaluated

Scroll the table horizontally to see additional columns, if needed.

Category scoring criteria total 100%
CriterionWeightWhat the jury looks for
Sustained professional impact30%Long-term influence and demonstrable contribution across organisations/communities.
Advancement of the profession25%Standards, practice, institutions, education, research or professional service.
Thought leadership15%Ideas or frameworks that have influenced practice.
Mentoring & legacy15%Development of people, communities and future leaders.
Ethics, credibility & service15%Professional standing, integrity and service orientation.

Each criterion uses a 1–5 evidence scale. Recommended weighted score = Σ(weight × score ÷ 5). A 70/100 quality threshold informs jury judgement, with the option to confer no award.

How this honour is conferred

This is a scarce, jury-conferred honour. The recommended route is confidential nominations invited from senior professionals, past leaders or the Awards Council. Self-nomination is not recommended. Contact the Secretariat to ask about the invitation route; an enquiry does not constitute an accepted nomination.

There is no separate application charge in the proposed fee schedule. The jury may confer no award.

Category guidance

This honour should remain scarce. The jury may withhold it without explanation beyond stating that no award was conferred.

Before applying, check the final nomination window, geographic eligibility and fee or waiver terms. Category scoring criteria and weightings will be frozen before nominations open.